Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David D. Dockery's avatar

I don’t teach architecture but I do teach media, and this is one of those dilemmas I constantly face in course design. How much time do I spend teaching principles and how much time do I spend on the tools?

It’s easy for non-academics to scoff and say, “Theory? Graduates don’t need theory! They need skill in Photoshop/InDesign/Premiere Pro!”

But graduates do need theory. Our entire world is sustained by the infrastructure of theory. And it is much harder to learn all that theory outside the classroom than it is to learn Photoshop.

That’s why courses sometimes only lightly touch on tools. You’ve got 16 weeks, if you are lucky, to form students in the practice a course is trying to teach. It can’t all be spent mastering the finer nuances of Adobe.

Sam Mcheileh's avatar

Cathal, it baffles me that so many students come to you with this issue! I’ve been involved in hiring in most of the firms I’ve worked at and never once used software as a factor to filter applicants.

Attitude is always number 1 for me - because with a good one anything else is possible including the ability to learn tools.

In saying that, I agree that it’s important to have agency and take the initiative to learn. No one is coming to save you. I taught myself most programs and also wrote about this topic of learning and creativity in an essay two weeks ago.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?